Pranav's Feature Strengths/Weaknesses + Self Grade
Features: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Next Steps
1. CodePalette Feature
Strengths:
- Allows users to submit, update, and delete programming languages efficiently.
- Uses a frontend form and dynamic table to display data in an organized manner.
- Integrates seamlessly with the backend API using Python URI.
Weaknesses:
- The UI/UX could be more engaging and user-friendly for a social media experience.
- Lacks features like user comments, reactions, or discussions on programming languages.
Next Steps:
- Improve UI design to enhance user engagement.
- Implement a comment/reaction system for community interaction.
- Add better validation and error messages.
2. Leaderboard Feature
Strengths:
- Tracks and displays top contributors effectively.
- Encourages competition and engagement among users.
- Dynamically updates rankings based on contributions.
Weaknesses:
- Might lack filtering options for different ranking criteria.
- No mechanism to prevent spam or unfair ranking manipulation.
- Needs better visuals and animations for a more engaging experience.
Next Steps:
- Implement filtering options (e.g., by time period, category).
- Add security measures to prevent ranking abuse.
- Improve UI with animations and interactive elements.
3. Backend Admin Dashboard
Strengths:
- Provides administrators with control over user submissions and content.
- Supports moderation of programming language entries.
- Helps track system performance and user activity.
Weaknesses:
- The UI may not be intuitive or streamlined for admin usage.
- Lacks role-based access control (RBAC) for different admin levels.
- Limited analytics and reporting functionalities.
Next Steps:
- Improve dashboard design for ease of use.
- Implement RBAC for better security and management.
- Add analytics and reports for user trends and content performance.
4. General Settings API
Strengths:
- Allows customization of platform-wide settings.
- Provides a centralized way to manage site descriptions
Weaknesses:
- May lack detailed documentation for easy setup and modification.
Next Steps:
- Improve input validation and error handling.
- Incorporate into Footer of the Page on Frontend
5. Health API
Strengths:
- Monitors system health and uptime.
- Helps identify performance bottlenecks and failures.
- Provides real-time status updates for backend services.
Weaknesses:
- May not provide detailed logs or insights into failures.
- Needs better alerting mechanisms for critical issues.
- Could integrate with external monitoring tools for better diagnostics.
Next Steps:
- Enhance logging and debugging information.
- Implement automated alerts for system failures.
- Integrate with external monitoring tools like Prometheus or Grafana.
Self-Grade Table
Category | Details | Self-Grade (Out of 1) |
---|---|---|
Learning & Skill Growth | Gained experience in Flask, Deployment, AWS, and Frontend to Backend integration. | 0.20 |
Commit Analytics | Committed even while in India, showing dedication and consistency in project contributions. | 0.22 |
Work Ethic & Collaboration | Assisted classmates in multiple periods, added features for group members, stayed productive. | 0.15 |
Areas for Improvement | Need to maintain focus consistently and work on improving efficiency in problem-solving and deployment strategies. | 0.15 |
Total | Comprehensive contribution and consistent effort throughout the trimester. | 0.92 |
Analytics Table
Frontend Contributions | Backend Contributions |
---|---|
2nd Highest Contributor | Leading Contributor |
Summary: Why I Deserve a 0.92/1
This trimester has been filled with ups and downs, but I have made significant progress. Before this trimester, I had little experience with Flask, AWS, or full-stack deployment, but I have since developed these skills and applied them to my work. My commit analytics show my steady contributions, even when I was in India, demonstrating dedication and consistency. While there is always room for improvement, I have been a strong team member, contributed meaningful features, and maintained a productive work ethic. For these reasons, I believe I deserve a 0.92/1 on this retrospective self-grade.
Full Review Self Grade
Category | Points | Description | Self Grade |
---|---|---|---|
Five tasks over 12 weeks | 5 | List five things completed, including issues addressed, burndown tracking, and presentation work. | 4.6 |
Full Stack Project Demo | 2 | Demonstrate the project, highlight CPT requirements, and incorporate N@tM feedback. | 1.90 |
Project Feature Blog Write-up | 1 | Use CPT/FRQ language to write a structured blog post on project features. | 0.92 |
MCQ Completion | 1 | Successfully complete and reflect on multiple-choice questions. | 0.93 |
Retrospective Reflection | 1 | - Reflect on strengths and weaknesses - Create next steps plans for improvement - Engage with peer projects and document interests - Think about future steps in CompSci, classes, college, internships, or career - Help a new peer with final exam prep or conduct a live review with Ms. Pataki - Send a detailed summary of review points 24 hours in advance, including a self-grade assessment |
0.92 |
Total | 10 | Maximum possible score. | 9.27 |