Pranav's Practice Review Reflection
Peer Grade (Done After Live Review - Rayhaan Sheeraj)
| Category | Points | Description | Peer Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five tasks over 12 weeks | 5 | List five things completed, including issues addressed, burndown tracking, and presentation work. | 4.6 |
| Full Stack Project Demo | 2 | Demonstrate the project, highlight CPT requirements, and incorporate N@tM feedback. | 1.9 |
| Project Feature Blog Write-up | 1 | Use CPT/FRQ language to write a structured blog post on project features. | .92 |
| MCQ Completion | 1 | Successfully complete and reflect on multiple-choice questions. | 1 |
| Retrospective Reflection | 1 | - Reflect on strengths and weaknesses - Create next steps plans for improvement - Engage with peer projects and document interests - Think about future steps in CompSci, classes, college, internships, or career - Help a new peer with final exam prep or conduct a live review with Ms. Pataki - Send a detailed summary of review points 24 hours in advance, including a self-grade assessment |
.9 |
| Total | 10 | Maximum possible score. | 9.32 |
Feedback
- Add images to your Big 5 Issue
- highlight specific CPT requirements during the demo
- Incorporate code blocks into the project feature blog
- Focus on talking about only the key details during the live review so it isn’t over 3 minutes
Improvements
- Added Images
- Highlighted CPT Requirements on take 2.
- Incorporated stronger code blocks
- Talked about my main strong details so I wouldn’t go overtime on take 2.